Government IT strategy confirms savings target

The Cabinet Office has launched the new Government ICT Strategy with the claim it will save £3.2bn per year from 2013-14

  • Kable,

The document, published on 27 January 2010, brings together the initiatives launched over the past year in what it describes as a plan for a "smarter, cheaper and greener public sector ICT infrastructure".

Cabinet Office minister Angela Smith forecast the savings would hit £3.2bn annually, equivalent to the 20% saving on ICT identified by last year's Operational Efficiency Programme, and that it would contribute to higher quality services.

"We are committed to putting the public's needs first," she said. "That is why we are innovating and revolutionising our ICT systems to ensure that they are as effective and efficient as possible for those working in the public sector, and at the same time we are able to make huge savings."

The key measures of the plan have already been launched and publicised by the Cabinet Office. They include: establishing the G Cloud for ICT services for government in a cloud environment; reducing the number of government data centres from more than 100 to 10-12; creating a Government Applications Store of reusable online computer programs on a pay by use basis; and the implementation of a common strategy for desktop computers.

It says the resulting savings would be £300m annually from the data centre rationalisation, £500m per year from the Applications Store and £400m per year from the desktop strategy.

John Suffolk, the government chief information officer, said: "We have seen a period of significant change over recent months and years. Technology has changed, the economy has changed and ICT in government must also change.

"This strategy sets out a new model for government ICT which will deliver a secure and resilient ICT infrastructure that will enable faster, better services for the public."

He added that the Applications Store is still in the design phase but is expected to begin delivering a few "quick wins" in the course of this year.

"It's like all these things, it looks fine on paper but you've really got to go out and try some of this stuff," he told GC News. "So low level, relatively simple quick wins are on the agenda for this year."

He said that suppliers will be able to publish details of services or products in the store without a procurement, and that any contracting vehicles would also be documented. The idea would be to give potential customers as much information as possible to help with their decisions, and that the Cabinet Office is currently working with suppliers to see how it could be set up.

Also noted in the strategy is the creation late last year of the Implementation Steering Group, which deals with the Chief Technology Officers Council, the programme boards and steering groups and the Supply Management Board, and reports to the Chief Information Officers Council. Suffolk said it is pulling all the elements of the strategy together; for example, in ensuring that the desktop strategy and plans for the G Cloud are compatible.


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order

Comments are now closed for this entry.
  • This symbol indicates that that person is Kable's staffStaff
  • AlwynWelch

    28 Jan 2010, 11:12AM

    I question whether it makes sense to have one IT strategy for such a large part of the economy. The Government?s ICT strategy is vague and focused more on technology than meeting business objectives, which may be a consequence of trying to cover the whole public sector in one document.

    Although there are some pragmatic comments on inter-operability throughout the report, this is really a catch-up and an area that most commercial organisations have included in their IT strategies for 10 years. This is all a bit too late in my opinion but may explain why the Government is trying to make this all-encompassing document fit for purpose for the whole of the public sector.

    Some of the ?initiatives?, such as the rationalisation of data centres, will cost significant money to implement before we see any benefits. However as Martin Read noted in his recent report, the public sector does not have adequate measurement, control or accountability processes to ensure this type of proposal actually delivers the savings promised.

    Throughout the report there is little new thinking about how to avoid further IT disasters in the future. It doesn?t matter if intentions are good; if there?s a substantial investment, there needs to be a substantial and tangible return and real user ownership for disasters.

    Alwyn Welch
    CEO
    Parity Group

Comments are now closed for this entry.

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.